|
Introduction Magic Squares
Magic Cubes Magic Tesseracts

Introduction
Magic hypercubes may be
classified by reference to which r-agonals sum correctly to the
magic constant. For magic squares and magic cubes, this has been discussed
previously. [1]
[2] [3]
[4]
A brief review will be presented on this page, using a different
prospective. Then I will present the classes for the magic tesseract. Note
that within these classes, the hypercube may have additional features,
such as associated, compact complete, inlaid, multiply, etc.
On this page, the variable
r will range from 1 to m, where m indicates the order. n,
as usual on my pages, will indicate the dimension of the hypercube.
Another name for 1-agonal is orthogonal lines (those parallel to the edges of
the hypercube). Only 1 coordinate change when moving along the line.
Another name for 2-agonal is diagonal. 2 coordinates change when moving along
the line.
Another name for 3-agonal is triagonal. 3 coordinates change when moving along
the line.
Another name for 4-agonal is quadragonal. 4 coordinates change when moving along
the line.
A particular hypercube may have some, but not all of the correct r-agonals
that would qualify it for a higher class.
The prefix pan
indicates all of that r-agonal, both 1-segment and multi-segment
(broken).
A pandiagonal magic square
may be transformed to another pandiagonal magic square by moving a row or column
from one side of the square to the opposite side. Similarly, a pantriagonal
magic cube may be transformed into another pantriagonal magic cube by moving a
plane from one side of the cube to the other! Furthermore, a panquadragonal
magic tesseract may be transformed to another one by moving a cube from one side
to the other! Etc.

Magic
squares (n = 2)
There are only two classes of
magic squares.
|
Class name |
Minimum requirements |
Minimum correct summation |
Lowest
order |
|
Simple |
All 1-agonals and the
two main 2-agonals sum correctly. |
2m +
2 |
3 |
|
Pandiagonal (nasik) |
All 1-agonals and all
2-agonals sum correctly.
This class has been referred to historically as being Perfect, and
has been so called in Hendricks Universal Classification System. Frost
called it Nasik.
To avoid confusion in the higher dimensions for this highest possible
class, I have started using the term nasik in place of perfect.
[5] |
4m |
4 |

Magic
cubes (n = 3)
There are six classes of
magic cubes.
|
Class name |
Minimum requirements |
Minimum correct summations |
Lowest
order |
|
Simple |
all 1-agonals and the
four main 3-agonals sum correctly. |
3m2 + 4 |
3 |
|
Pantriagonal |
all 1-agonals and all
3-agonals sum correctly. |
7m2 |
4 |
|
Diagonal |
all 1-agonals and the
four main 3-agonals sum correctly. In addition, the two main diagonals
(2-agonals) of each orthogonal plane sum correctly. |
3m2+6m+4 |
5 |
|
Pantriagonal
diagonal |
all 1-agonals and all
3-agonals sum correctly. In addition, the two main diagonals (2-agonals)
of each orthogonal plane sum correctly. |
7m2+6m |
5 |
|
Pandiagonal |
all 1-agonals and the
four main 3-agonals sum correctly. In addition, all 2-agonals of each
orthogonal plane sum correctly. |
9m2 + 4 |
7 |
|
Nasik |
this is a combination
Pantriagonal and Pandiagonal cube, so all 1-agonals and all 3-agonals sum
correctly, and all 2-agonals of each orthogonal plane sum correctly.
Hendricks calls this top class (all possible lines sum correctly)
perfect. Nakamura calls it pan-2,3-agonal. |
13m2 |
8 |
 
Magic
tesseracts (n = 4)
There are
2 classes of magic squares and 6 classes of magic cubes. So it is to be expected
that there will be many more classes of magic tesseract. In fact, there are 18.
Names of these are arbitrarily chosen to be descriptive, rather then concise. As
in the case for the square and the cube, these classes are listed in order of
increasing number of correct lines. In late 2007, Mitsutoshi Nakamura had
constructed a tesseract in most of these classes. [4]
|
Class name |
Minimum requirements |
Minimum
correct summations |
Lowest
order |
|
Simple |
All 1-agonals and the
eight main (1-segment) 4-agonals sum correctly.
This is a basic requirement for classes of tesseract to be magic. |
4m3 + 8 |
|
|
Triagonal |
Basic + all main
(1-segment) 3-agonals sum correctly. |
4m3 + 16m + 8 |
4 |
|
Diagonal |
Basic + all main
(1-segment) 2-agonals sum correctly. |
4m3 + 12m2
+ 8 |
4 |
|
Diagonal + Triagonal |
Basic + all main
2-agonals and 3-agonals sum correctly. |
4m3 + 12m2
+ 16m + 8 |
8? |
|
Panquadragonal |
Basic + all 4-agonals sum
correctly. |
12m3 |
4 |
|
Triagonal + Pan4 |
Basic + all 1-segment
3-agonals + all 4-agonals. |
12m3
+ 16m |
4 |
|
Diagonal + Pan4 |
Basic + all 1-segment
2-agonals + all 4-agonals. |
12m3
+ 12m2 |
8? |
|
Diagonal + Triagonal +
Pan4 |
Basic + all 1-segment
2-agonals + all 1-segment 3-agonals + all 4-agonals. |
12m3
+ 12m2 + 16m |
8? |
|
Pandiagonal |
Basic + all 2-agonals. |
16m3 + 8 |
9? |
|
Triagonal + Pan2 |
Basic + all 1-segment
3-agonals + all 2-agonals. |
16m3
+ 16m + 8 |
? |
|
Pantriagonal |
Basic + all 3-agonals.
|
20m3 + 8 |
4 |
|
Diagonal + Pan3 |
Basic + all 1-segment
2-agonals + all 3-agonals. |
20m3
+ 12m2 + 8 |
? |
|
Pan2 + Pan4 |
Basic + all 2-agonals +
all 4-agonals. |
24m3 |
13? |
|
Triagonal + Pan2 +
Pan4 |
Basic + all 1-segment
3-agonals + all 2-agonals + all 4-agonals. |
24m3 + 16m |
16? |
|
Pan3 + Pan4 |
Basic + all 3-agonals +
all 4-agonals. |
28m3 |
4 |
|
Diagonal + Pan3 + Pan4 |
Basic + all 1-segment
2-agonals + all 3-agonals + all 4-agonals. |
28m3
+ 12m2 |
8 |
|
Pan2 + Pan3 |
Basic + all 2-agonals +
all 3-agonals. |
32m3 + 8 |
15? |
|
Nasik
[5] [6]
[7] [8] |
Basic + all 2-agonals +
all 3-agonals + all 4-agonals.
Hendricks calls this top class (all possible lines sum correctly)
perfect.
Nakamura calls it pan-2,3,4-agonal [4]. |
40m3 |
16 |
Statistical
information on these classifications are shown in tables on my
Hypercube Math page.
I have not personally checked most of the tesseracts mentioned in this table.

Footnotes
[1] Heinz & Hendricks, A Unified Classification
System for Magic Hypercubes, Journal of Recreational Mathematics, 32:1,
2003-2004, pages 30-36
[2] H. D. Heinz, The First (?) Perfect Magic
Cubes, JRM, 33:2, 2004-2005, pages 116-119
[3] My
Six Classes of Cubes
article
[4] Mitsutoshi Nakamura’s
http://homepage2.nifty.com/googol/magcube/en/classes.htm
[5] Nasik from Frost’s original term for pandiagonal
magic squares, and Planck’s subsequent expansion of the definition to include
the highest class of all dimensions of magic hypercubes. See [6][7][8] and my
Nasik article. Less ambiguous then perfect!
[6]
A. H. Frost,
Invention of Magic Cubes, Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, 7, 1866,
pages 92-102. See page 99, para. 23 and page 100, para. 26.
[7] C. Planck, The Theory of Path Nasiks,
Printed for private circulation by A. J. Lawrence, Printer, Rugby (England),1905
(Available from The University Library, Cambridge).
[8] W. S. Andrews, Magic Squares and Cubes. Open
Court Publ.,1917. Pages 365,366, by Dr. C. Planck. Re-published by Dover Publ.,
1960, Pages 365,366 (no ISBN); Dover Publ., 2000, 0486206580; Cosimo Classics,
Inc., 2004, 1596050373
|