![]()
This latest update page was inspired by several interesting items I recently received from other magic square hobbyists.
I have taken this opportunity to also include small interesting
items I have been collecting over recent years.
Hopefully you, the reader, will also find them interesting!
![]()
![]()
Amela Fundamental Solution
In May 2010
Miguel Angel Amela of Argentina sent me a paper where he presented algorithms
for constructing all order 4 and order 5 pandiagonal magic squares from a
fundamental square.
[1]
This was previously demonstrated for the order-5 pandiagonals by Benson and
Jacoby in 1976
[2]
by means of an algebraic square. I show this method on my
Pandiagonal 5x5 page
However, Amela
demonstrates how to do this by cell exchange transformations from any one of
these 3600 magic squares.
Rather then attempt to explain these transformations I have made his paper
available for download (with his permission).
[3]
Here I present an interesting but unrelated footnote that he had added to his page in the final revision.

The 3 x 3 squares are the nine ways these numbers may be arranged in an array with all diagonals summing to 15. However, most of the rows and columns do not, so the squares are not magic. The nine arrays are arranged to form an order-9 simple magic square. The center number of each 3 x 3 array form one order-3 simple magic square!
|
Order-5 Pandiagonal multiplication From another paper [4] by Miguel Amela, I found this order-5 multiplication magic square. According to his paper, this is one of exactly 3600 unique pandiagonal solutions. |
|
![]()
Multiplicative diamond compact pandiagonal square
|
A few days after posting this page, Miguel sent me [5] an example of an unusual order-6 square. While not magic in the conventional sense, it has it's own type of magic. Zig-zag cells of any two adjacent lines (horizontal or vertical) sum to a constant. An example is shown starting at cell 1 of top line in illustration. Also, any 4 cells in a 2x2 diamond pattern, as shown in lower right corner, sum to a constant. Either pattern may start on any of the 36 cells in the square (using wrap-around). |
|
[1]
Amela’s paper released in June 2010, is titled Fundamental Solution in Magic
Squares of Order Four and Five.
[2] Benson and Jacoby, New Recreations With Magic Squares, Dover Publ. 1976,
0-486-23236-0,
[3] My
download page is here.
[4] Total Compactness in Magic Squares of Order Five.
[5] email dated July 17,2004
![]()
Knecht Topographical squares
Craig Knecht
recently sent me an update on his topographical squares. The following
information is condensed from that email.
Review the subject on my last square-update page.
[1]
For more in-depth information refer to Craig’s web site.
[2]
The following image shows simple magic squares for orders 7, 8, and 9. Included with each square is the author, date, and units of retention.
In each case,
this is the maximum possible for that order.
Note that for order 7, there are 2 ‘lakes’ (12 and 3 cells) and 2 ‘ponds’. For
order-8 there are 2 lakes (14 and 5 cells) and 4 ponds. For order-9 there are
also 2 lakes (25 and 3 cells) and 6 ponds. Co-incidence?

Al Zimmermann [3] ran a contest to see who would find the largest amount of retained water for each magic square up to order-28. The contest ended June 12, 2010. Following are the first author to find the maximum for each order. Note that these are not proven to be the maximum possible!
|
Order |
Author |
Date |
Units |
Order |
Author |
Date |
Units |
|
|
6 |
Wes Sampson |
Mar. 14, 2010 |
192 |
18 |
Jarek Wroblewski |
March 23, 2010 |
31,871 |
|
|
7 |
Hermann Jurksch |
Apr. 6, 2010 |
418 |
19 |
Jarek Wroblewski |
March 23, 2010 |
40,473 |
|
|
8 |
Hermann Jurksch |
Apr. 5, 2010 |
797 |
20 |
Jarek Wroblewski |
March 24, 2010 |
50,754 |
|
|
9 |
Walter Trump |
June 12, 2010 |
1,408 |
21 |
Jarek Wroblewski |
March 24, 2010 |
62,877 |
|
|
10 |
James J Youlton Jr |
Apr. 12, 2010 |
2,267 |
22 |
Jarek Wroblewski |
March 23, 2010 |
77,098 |
|
|
11 |
Hugo Pfoertner |
Apr. 22, 2010 |
3,492 |
23 |
Jarek Wroblewski |
March 23, 2010 |
93,623 |
|
|
12 |
Hermann Jurksch |
June 10, 2010 |
5,185 |
24 |
Jarek Wroblewski |
March 24, 2010 |
112,710 |
|
|
13 |
Walter Trump |
May 5, 2010 |
7,442 |
25 |
Jarek Wroblewski |
March 23, 2010 |
134,598 |
|
|
14 |
Frederic van der Plancke |
May 19, 2010 |
10,397 |
26 |
Jarek Wroblewski |
March 24, 2010 |
159,565 |
|
|
15 |
James J Youlton Jr |
Apr. 15, 2010 |
14,154 |
27 |
Jarek Wroblewski |
March 23, 2010 |
187,880 |
|
|
16 |
James J Youlton Jr |
Apr. 4, 2010 |
18,887 |
28 |
Jarek Wroblewski |
March 24, 2010 |
219,822 |
|
|
17 |
Jarek Wroblewski |
Mar. 23, 2010 |
24,730 |
100 |
Craig Knecht |
August 14, 2009 |
34,788,903 |
It is interesting
that there are several maximum solutions for many orders. Order-6 for example
had 20 different solutions submitted to the contest between March 14 and June 8,
2010 with 192 units of retention.
Order 18 is interesting because 2 solutions were submitted, showing 31,871
units. The one found by Walter Trump has 199 cells and the one found by Jarek
Wroblewski requires 200 cells! Since the contest ended, Walter Trump has already
bettered this order-18 record to 31,872!
As a point of interest: Craig sent me an order 100 magic square on Aug. 14, 2009. Magic sum was 500,050. Units of retention totalled 34,788,903!
[1] Information previously posted on my site is
here
and here.
[2] Craig Knecht’s site is at
http://www.knechtmagicsquare.paulscomputing.com/
[3] Al Zimmermann's Programming Contests at
http://www.azspcs.net/Contest/MagicWater (ended June 12, 2010)
Campbell complete order-8
I received the following order-8 magic square (a.) from Dwane Campbell in November 2009.
The square is pandiagonal, and is composed of 2 by 2 blocks of cells, with each of these containing 4 consecutive numbers.
The order-4 square (b.) is also pandiagonal magic and consists of the sums of each of the 16 blocks.
As an additional feature, the identical corner of each 2x2 block can be combined to make 4 additional order-4 pandiagonal magic squares. One of these (also pandiagonal) is shown (c.).

The above squares are all 2complete2 because 2 integers placed m/2 along a diagonal sum to the same value (S/4 for the order-8 and S/2 for the order-4 squares).
The order-8 square is not compact even though it consists of 2x2 blocks, because the blocks do not sum to the same value. However, corners of 3x3 arrays sum correctly so the order-8 is compact_3. (It is also compact_5 as a result of being complete and compact_7 as a result of being compact_3.)
More information on complete and compact is here.
![]()
Gus Arrington’s model square
Gus Arrington of Boyd, Texas sent me the order-9 magic squares shown in the image as Squares a. and c. Square c. is a normal simple magic square with integers from 1 to 81. Square a. uses integers from 82 to 162. He also sent some images of a wooden ball he constructed. Following is his description of the model.
The above squares are placed back to back on the ball, so that each circuit round the ball passes through 18 numbers that sum to 1467. Each ring on the ball will rotate independently, and as long as the main diagonal numbers on all rings are aligned, the rows, columns, and main diagonals will sum correctly.
I have reproduced Square b. from the images of the model, and indicated the rings. It is square a. with the 2nd and 3rd rings from the center rotated.

Alex de Wit Squares
Several years ago, Alex de Wit sent me a number of unusual magic squares. I am taking this opportunity to finally include some of them on my site.
Upside down
This magic
square is composed of Roman Numerals. When rotated 180 degrees it forms
another magic square with a different arrangement of the same integers.
All rows and columns, the two diagonals, and the 4 corners plus the center
cell sum to XLIV (or 44). |
![]() T square This simple magic square consists of numbers all starting with the letter ‘T’.
|
|
![]() Broken square Although
several cells are missing, all rows, columns, main diagonals, the four
corners, and the center 2x2 add up to 32. |
![]() Magic rectangle In this
associated magic rectangle, 3 rows, 5 columns, 6 diagonals, the 4 corner
cells, and the corners of the central 3x3 all sum to 0! |
|
|
Next-to-Main Diagonals This is a simple magic square. However, it has the feature that the two 7 cell diagonals parallel to each main diagonal also sum to S
|
![]() |
![]()
Add Multiply Orders 6 and 4
|
This order 6 simple magic square has all rows, columns, and main diagonals summing to 1355. Embedded in it is an order-4 magic multiplication square with all 8 lines producing a product of 401,393,664. If the digits of each integer in the 4x4 square are reversed (408 becomes 804, etc), the square remains magic, with a product of 4,723,906,824. It was constructed before 1966 [1] by Ronald B. Edwards of Rochester , New York |
![]() |
[1] Joseph S. Madachy, Mathematics on Vacation, 1968, 17 147099 0, page 90. © Joseph S. Madachy 1966
Prime Number Talisman Heterosquare
|
This order-5 heterosquare consisting of consecutive prime numbers from 4673 to 4909 was constructed by Enoch Haga in 2004. The 5 rows, 5 columns, and 2 main diagonals all sum to different values from 23565 to 24349. It also has the following features!
|
![]() |
All 25 2x2 arrays (including wrap-around) sum to different values between 18912 and 19386.
All 25 3x3 arrays (including wrap-around) sum to different values between 42747 and 43477.
This is also a talisman square because the minimum difference between adjacent cells (in this case) are greater then 17.
All 16 2x2
arrays (wrap-around doesn’t work here because of duplicate pairings) have unique
minimum differences between the 6 cell pairs of each array. For example, the
minimum of six differences in the top left array is 4729-4673 = 56. The differences for
the other similar arrays are 60, 54, 62, 42, 18, 30, 26, 58, 34, 48, 44, 28, 24,
38, and 32. The minimum difference for the entire order-5 square is the smallest
of these values. i.e. 18.
This square is an elaboration of a type of square array investigated and named
by Sidney Kravitz. A talisman square (not necessarily magic) must have a minimum
difference between adjacent cells (horizontal, vertical, and diagonal) greater
then some specified amount. See square b with it's minimum difference of 3.
[1]
[1] J. S. Madachy, Madachy’s Mathematical Recreations, Dover Publ. , 1979, 0-486-23762-1 pp.110-113
![]()
Magic - Antimagic Combined
Some years ago Carlos Rivera [1] suggested a problem involving order-5 magic or antimagic squares containing an order-3 antimagic or magic square. Below are shown several of the results he obtained.
![]() |
Kurchan square The 3x3 square is magic with S = 39. The 5x5 is antimagic with S = consecutive numbers 59 to 70. This square uses consecutive numbers from 1 to 25 so it is ‘normal’. It is a ‘bordered’ [2] square because the 9 central numbers (of the range) are in the center square. Rosa
square |
[1] See
Carlos Rivera’s
http://www.primepuzzles.net/puzzles/puzz_263.htm
[2] See my anti-magic squares page for more on
antimagic and heterosquares.
![]()
Miscellaneous Tidbits
As mentioned at the start, not all items on this page are recent. Here are a variety I have collected over the years.

[1] Anurag
Sahay. Email of May 2, 2005
[2] Dudeney's T square is on my
Prime Squares page
[3] Benson and Jacoby, New Recreations With Magic Squares, Dover Publ. 1976,
0-486-23236-0, p. 47
[4] Supplied by Ed Shineman Jr. He reports it was shown at the Believe it or
Not Odditorium at the Chicago World Fair 1933
[5] Sabastião A. DiSilva email of March 26, 2005
Please send me Feedback about my Web
site!![]()
![]()

![]()
Harvey Heinz harveyheinz@shaw.ca
This page originally posted July 2010
This page last updated
July 24, 2010
Copyright © 2010 by Harvey D. Heinz